When it comes to personal injury lawsuits, it’s important to understand the difference between settlement value and trial value. These terms refer to different ways of estimating what your case might be worth—either through pre-trial negotiations or a full courtroom trial. Both involve different risks, benefits, and timelines, and knowing the difference can help you make informed decisions about how to move forward.
What Is Settlement Value?
The settlement value is what a plaintiff might expect to receive if the case is resolved through negotiation before going to trial. This figure is influenced by the strength of your evidence, the likelihood the other party wants to avoid trial, and the appeal of a guaranteed payout. Settlements are often lower than trial awards because both parties compromise to avoid the uncertainty, cost, and time of a trial.
What Is Trial Value?
Trial value, on the other hand, estimates the potential value of a case if it’s presented to a jury and results in a favorable verdict. This includes maximum damages for medical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, and even punitive damages. While trial values are often higher, they also come with greater risk and no guarantees. A jury could award more—or less—or nothing at all.
How Professionals Estimate Case Value
To determine the settlement or trial value of a case, attorneys often work with economic, medical, and vocational experts. Economists help calculate lost wages and future earnings, while medical experts speak to injury severity and treatment needs. Vocational specialists assess how your injury affects your ability to work, and actuaries use statistical models to project long-term financial impacts. These experts help quantify damages and guide realistic expectations.
The Math Behind Case Value
Though no fixed formula exists, attorneys use simplified calculations to weigh risk and reward. For example:
Settlement Value = (Potential Trial Award × Likelihood of Success) – Trial Costs
Trial Value = Maximum Recoverable Damages – Risks & Uncertainty
Attorneys also consider insurance policy limits, precedent (outcomes in similar cases), and qualitative factors like pain and suffering. Two common methods for non-economic damages are the multiplier method (multiplying economic losses by a factor of 1.5 to 5) and the per diem method (assigning a daily value for pain and multiplying by the number of days affected).
Why Trial Isn’t Always Best
While a trial might offer the potential for a bigger payout, it involves high risk and long delays. Of the 5% of personal injury cases that go to trial, plaintiffs (the injured party) only win 50% of the time. A settlement provides certainty and often quicker access to funds. Your attorney’s role is to balance these factors and help you choose the path that best protects your interests.
Need Help with Your Case?
At Witt Law Group, we help personal injury clients evaluate every angle of their case, from settlement opportunities to trial risks. With experience, expert insight, and compassion, we’re here to guide you through complex legal decisions. If you’re unsure what your case is worth—or whether to settle or go to court—reach out today for a free consultation tailored to your unique situation. (360) 792-1000
Get help now
Whether you choose to handle your case alone or engage the Witt Law Group, being informed and prepared is essential. Early involvement of an attorney can significantly impact your chances of a fair recovery, allowing you to focus on healing while we handle negotiations with insurance adjusters to secure fair compensation for your injuries.
